Talk:House Rules: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ==Combat== | ||
===Friendly Fire=== | |||
:'''YOINK!''' I saw a quote on the [https://www.reddit.com/r/genesysrpg|Genesys Subreddit] by user Skar-Lath that said, “A despair should never turn a successful check into a failed one. And more successes should never make things worse, which is what happens if you hit an ally.” I like it. I’m taking it. Consider this attribution. | |||
===Thrown Weapons=== | |||
:It never made much sense to me that the same skill used for shooting a bow or a gun is also the skill used to throw a knife or a grenade. Further, it always struck me that most thrown items require strength to reach any significant range. This is why I settled on using '''Athletics''' for thrown weapons rather than '''Ranged (Light)'''. | |||
==Item Traits== | |||
===New Item Trait: Bonded=== | |||
:Back in the 80s, I used to run an AD&D game in the carport of my parents’ Arizona home. As a teenager, the concept of power really appealed to me, so I handed out magic items like candy in what I would later come to know as a “Monty Haul” style (named, of course, after the host of the original Let’s Make a Deal, Monty Hall). As I grew older, I tired of the power creep, the stacking of bonuses provided by different magic items and abilities, and the way players would game the system to make their characters as godlike as possible. Third Edition D&D was the breaking point for me; I could abide it no more. Why? Do a Google search for D&D bucket of snails or D&D pun-pun and you will have your answer. Eventually I stopped playing D&D entirely. | :Back in the 80s, I used to run an AD&D game in the carport of my parents’ Arizona home. As a teenager, the concept of power really appealed to me, so I handed out magic items like candy in what I would later come to know as a “Monty Haul” style (named, of course, after the host of the original Let’s Make a Deal, Monty Hall). As I grew older, I tired of the power creep, the stacking of bonuses provided by different magic items and abilities, and the way players would game the system to make their characters as godlike as possible. Third Edition D&D was the breaking point for me; I could abide it no more. Why? Do a Google search for D&D bucket of snails or D&D pun-pun and you will have your answer. Eventually I stopped playing D&D entirely. | ||
:With the introduction of magic items in | :With the introduction of magic items in ''Realms of Terrinoth'', I see the potential for some similar issues, players gaming the system. Heck, those of us who played the Star Wars RPG before this saw it happen there, with builds like the Doctor-Marauder. That issue, and a number of others, was fixed for Genesys, but the capacity of magic items to bring out the power creeper in players is strong. | ||
===The Wizards’ Solution=== | ===The Wizards’ Solution=== | ||
Line 20: | Line 27: | ||
:In the Star Wars RPG, a character (outside of a droid or a member of the gank species) could install a number of cybernetics equal to their Brawn plus one. Now, I’m not proposing we make Brawn the defacto stat here. In fact, I’d argue against using Brawn at all. After all, we’re not grappling magic items. Nor are we juggling them, so let’s discount Agility right away. The remaining four? Any one of them could be used. | :In the Star Wars RPG, a character (outside of a droid or a member of the gank species) could install a number of cybernetics equal to their Brawn plus one. Now, I’m not proposing we make Brawn the defacto stat here. In fact, I’d argue against using Brawn at all. After all, we’re not grappling magic items. Nor are we juggling them, so let’s discount Agility right away. The remaining four? Any one of them could be used. | ||
:* | :*'''Intellect –''' Knowing a thing or two about the arcane, about the lore involved with using magic items, could increase your ability to use them, and to bond with them. | ||
:* | :*'''Cunning –''' Figuring out how to juggle a number of magic items – in your psyche, not your hands – seems like a reasonable way to increase the number you could bond with at a time. | ||
:* | :*'''Willpower –''' Practiced discipline could make bonding to more magic items a possibility. | ||
:* | :*'''Presence –''' Commanding more items by sheer power of personality seems like a decent route, too. | ||
===What to Choose?=== | ===What to Choose?=== | ||
Line 33: | Line 40: | ||
:The rule, then, would have to start out with a new property for items. | :The rule, then, would have to start out with a new property for items. | ||
:: | ::'''''Bonded.''''' ''In order to benefit from this item’s supernatural properties, you must bond to the item.'' | ||
:Follow that up with a rule. | :Follow that up with a rule. | ||
:: | ::''You may bond to a number of magic items equal to your Willpower plus one. Magically enhancing your Willpower (by the Augment spell or an item-based effect) does not increase the number of items with which you can bond, but permanently raising Willpower (for instance, with the Dedication talent) does.'' | ||
:And there you have it. D&D-style attunement ported to the Genesys system, with a path that allows for improvement (though judicious use of the Dedication talent). | :And there you have it. D&D-style attunement ported to the Genesys system, with a path that allows for improvement (though judicious use of the Dedication talent). | ||
==Story Points== | |||
===Automatic Successes=== | |||
:The idea behind this is simple; it gives the players another opportunity - and another temptation - to spend Story Points, placing them in the GM’s pool. It’s not a great option, by any stretch of the imagination, but it does play well into the back-and-forth of the Story Point economy. |
Latest revision as of 02:08, 22 October 2023
Combat
Friendly Fire
- YOINK! I saw a quote on the Subreddit by user Skar-Lath that said, “A despair should never turn a successful check into a failed one. And more successes should never make things worse, which is what happens if you hit an ally.” I like it. I’m taking it. Consider this attribution.
Thrown Weapons
- It never made much sense to me that the same skill used for shooting a bow or a gun is also the skill used to throw a knife or a grenade. Further, it always struck me that most thrown items require strength to reach any significant range. This is why I settled on using Athletics for thrown weapons rather than Ranged (Light).
Item Traits
New Item Trait: Bonded
- Back in the 80s, I used to run an AD&D game in the carport of my parents’ Arizona home. As a teenager, the concept of power really appealed to me, so I handed out magic items like candy in what I would later come to know as a “Monty Haul” style (named, of course, after the host of the original Let’s Make a Deal, Monty Hall). As I grew older, I tired of the power creep, the stacking of bonuses provided by different magic items and abilities, and the way players would game the system to make their characters as godlike as possible. Third Edition D&D was the breaking point for me; I could abide it no more. Why? Do a Google search for D&D bucket of snails or D&D pun-pun and you will have your answer. Eventually I stopped playing D&D entirely.
- With the introduction of magic items in Realms of Terrinoth, I see the potential for some similar issues, players gaming the system. Heck, those of us who played the Star Wars RPG before this saw it happen there, with builds like the Doctor-Marauder. That issue, and a number of others, was fixed for Genesys, but the capacity of magic items to bring out the power creeper in players is strong.
The Wizards’ Solution
- With the introduction of Dungeons & Dragons 5E, Wizards of the Coast managed, at least to a degree, to forestall the power creep of magic items – or the super-stacking of benefits, anyway – by adding a requirement to some items called attunement. For those who don’t play the venerable grandfather of roleplaying games (count me among your number!), attunement is the process by which a character creates a mystical or spiritual bond with an item. A character can only be attuned to three items at a time, and cannot attune to more than one of a given item (so they cannot, for instance, attune to two Rings of Protection).
- The need for attunement is determined by the following (from the D&D5E DMG, p. 285):
- If having all the characters in a party pass an item around to gain its lasting benefits would be disruptive, the item should require attunement.
- If the item grants a bonus that other items also grant, it’s a good idea to require attunement so that characters don’t try to collect too many of those items.
- The advantage of attunement is pretty straightforward: it stems the impending rise of characters into individual nuclear superpowers by limiting their growth to XP-related improvements and items replaced by (rather than stacking with) other items. The down side? Some players might see it as stifling player advancement.
The Cybernetic Solution
- There might be a Genesys-related answer to the problem of magic items. In the Star Wars RPG and in the Android setting found in the Genesys Core Rule Book, characters are able to install cybernetic enhancements to their bodies, replacing limbs or eyes, enhancing brain function, allowing a character to breath underwater or when the air around them is toxic, and other such upgrades. While the Genesys version of cybernetic rules allows a character to install an unlimited number of cybernetic improvements (the only limitations being that each characteristic, skill, or derived stat can only be upgraded once), cybertech in Star Wars gives us a better and more thematic solution.
- In the Star Wars RPG, a character (outside of a droid or a member of the gank species) could install a number of cybernetics equal to their Brawn plus one. Now, I’m not proposing we make Brawn the defacto stat here. In fact, I’d argue against using Brawn at all. After all, we’re not grappling magic items. Nor are we juggling them, so let’s discount Agility right away. The remaining four? Any one of them could be used.
- Intellect – Knowing a thing or two about the arcane, about the lore involved with using magic items, could increase your ability to use them, and to bond with them.
- Cunning – Figuring out how to juggle a number of magic items – in your psyche, not your hands – seems like a reasonable way to increase the number you could bond with at a time.
- Willpower – Practiced discipline could make bonding to more magic items a possibility.
- Presence – Commanding more items by sheer power of personality seems like a decent route, too.
What to Choose?
- Of those four, I am inclined to go with Willpower. It just seems the proper approach to take, thematically; someone who is disciplined, who has a strong will, is able to push the envelope, to keep more bonded items in check. Not to mention, it has the least number of skills of those listed, and (discounting Divine, because it is very much a career-based skill) only two skills that get used regularly. Coercion is extremely situation, and isn’t often used by those who don’t have them as class skills. Of the four skills under Willpower, only Discipline and Vigilance are used regularly (and those often by characters who have ranks in neither).
- Willpower seems the obvious choice.
A New Rule: Bonded
- The rule, then, would have to start out with a new property for items.
- Bonded. In order to benefit from this item’s supernatural properties, you must bond to the item.
- Follow that up with a rule.
- You may bond to a number of magic items equal to your Willpower plus one. Magically enhancing your Willpower (by the Augment spell or an item-based effect) does not increase the number of items with which you can bond, but permanently raising Willpower (for instance, with the Dedication talent) does.
- And there you have it. D&D-style attunement ported to the Genesys system, with a path that allows for improvement (though judicious use of the Dedication talent).
Story Points
Automatic Successes
- The idea behind this is simple; it gives the players another opportunity - and another temptation - to spend Story Points, placing them in the GM’s pool. It’s not a great option, by any stretch of the imagination, but it does play well into the back-and-forth of the Story Point economy.